<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google loosens trademark policy in the UK &amp; Ireland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brandverity.com/10/google-loosens-trademark-policy-in-the-uk-ireland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brandverity.com/10/google-loosens-trademark-policy-in-the-uk-ireland/</link>
	<description>Trademark Abuse Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Implications of the ECJ Interflora AdWords Opinion - BrandVerity</title>
		<link>http://blog.brandverity.com/10/google-loosens-trademark-policy-in-the-uk-ireland/#comment-16096</link>
		<dc:creator>Implications of the ECJ Interflora AdWords Opinion - BrandVerity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brandverity.com/?p=10#comment-16096</guid>
		<description>[...] estimates that its paid search costs increased 14-fold (or increased $750k per year) when Google liberalized its trademark policy in the UK in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] estimates that its paid search costs increased 14-fold (or increased $750k per year) when Google liberalized its trademark policy in the UK in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

